QA overview：先把底下那条暗线看见

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：The private QA stack is meant to exercise OpenClaw in a more realistic, 消息通道-shaped way than a single unit test can. Cu…。

The private QA stack is meant to exercise OpenClaw in a more realistic, channel-shaped way than a single unit test can.

Current pieces:

reaction, edit, and delete surfaces.

injecting inbound messages, and exporting a Markdown report.

drive a real channel inside a child QA gateway.

scenarios.

need real transports, browser screenshots, VM state, and PR evidence.

• extensions/qa-channel: synthetic message channel with DM, channel, thread,
• extensions/qa-lab: debugger UI and QA bus for observing the transcript,
• extensions/qa-matrix, future runner plugins: live-transport adapters that
• qa/: repo-backed seed assets for the kickoff task and baseline QA
• Mantis: before and after live verification for bugs that

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Every QA flow runs under pnpm openclaw qa <sub魔法口令>. Many have pnpm qa:* script aliases; both forms are supported.

Every QA flow runs under pnpm openclaw qa <subcommand>. Many have pnpm qa:* script aliases; both forms are supported.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：The current QA operator flow is a two-pane QA site: Run it with: That builds the QA site, starts the Docker-backed 门口的小…。

The current QA operator flow is a two-pane QA site:

• Left: Gateway dashboard (Control UI) with the agent.
• Right: QA Lab, showing the Slack-ish transcript and scenario plan.

Run it with:

pnpm qa:lab:up

That builds the QA site, starts the Docker-backed gateway lane, and exposes the QA Lab page where an operator or automation loop can give the agent a QA mission, observe real channel behavior, and record what worked, failed, or stayed blocked.

For faster QA Lab UI iteration without rebuilding the Docker image each time, start the stack with a bind-mounted QA Lab bundle:

pnpm openclaw qa docker-build-image
pnpm qa:lab:build
pnpm qa:lab:up:fast
pnpm qa:lab:watch

qa:lab:up:fast keeps the Docker services on a prebuilt image and bind-mounts extensions/qa-lab/web/dist into the qa-lab container. qa:lab:watch rebuilds that bundle on change, and the browser auto-reloads when the QA Lab asset hash changes.

For a local OpenTelemetry signal smoke, run:

pnpm qa:otel:smoke

That script starts a local OTLP/HTTP receiver, runs the otel-trace-smoke QA scenario with the diagnostics-otel plugin enabled, then asserts traces, metrics, and logs are exported. It decodes the exported protobuf trace spans and checks the release-critical shape: openclaw.run, openclaw.harness.run, openclaw.model.call, openclaw.context.assembled, and openclaw.message.delivery must be present; model calls must not export StreamAbandoned on successful turns; raw diagnostic IDs and openclaw.content.* attributes must stay out of the trace. The raw OTLP payloads must not contain the prompt sentinel, response sentinel, or QA session key. It writes otel-smoke-summary.json next to the QA suite artifacts.

For the protected Prometheus scrape smoke, run:

pnpm qa:prometheus:smoke

That alias runs the docker-prometheus-smoke QA scenario with diagnostics-prometheus enabled, verifies unauthenticated scrapes are rejected, then checks the authenticated scrape includes release-critical metric families without prompt content, response content, raw diagnostic identifiers, auth tokens, or local paths.

To run both observability smokes back to back, use:

pnpm qa:observability:smoke

Observability QA stays source-checkout only. The npm tarball intentionally omits QA Lab, so package Docker release lanes do not run qa commands. Use pnpm qa:otel:smoke, pnpm qa:prometheus:smoke, or pnpm qa:observability:smoke from a built source checkout when changing diagnostics instrumentation.

For a transport-real Matrix smoke lane, run:

pnpm openclaw qa matrix --profile fast --fail-fast

The full CLI reference, profile/scenario catalog, env vars, and artifact layout for this lane live in Matrix QA. At a glance: it provisions a disposable Tuwunel homeserver in Docker, registers temporary driver/SUT/observer users, runs the real Matrix plugin inside a child QA gateway scoped to that transport (no qa-channel), then writes a Markdown report, JSON summary, observed-events artifact, and combined output log under .artifacts/qa-e2e/matrix-<timestamp>/.

The scenarios cover transport behavior that unit tests cannot prove end to end: mention gating, allow-bot policies, allowlists, top-level and threaded replies, DM routing, reaction handling, inbound edit suppression, restart replay dedupe, homeserver interruption recovery, approval metadata delivery, media handling, and Matrix E2EE bootstrap/recovery/verification flows. The E2EE CLI profile also drives openclaw matrix encryption setup and verification commands through the same disposable homeserver before checking gateway replies.

Discord also has Mantis-only opt-in scenarios for bug reproduction. Use --scenario discord-status-reactions-tool-only for the explicit status reaction timeline, or --scenario discord-thread-reply-filepath-attachment to create a real Discord thread and verify that message.thread-reply preserves a filePath attachment. These scenarios stay out of the default live Discord lane because they are before/after repro probes rather than broad smoke coverage. The thread-attachment Mantis workflow can also add a logged-in Discord Web witness video when MANTIS_DISCORD_VIEWER_CHROME_PROFILE_DIR or MANTIS_DISCORD_VIEWER_CHROME_PROFILE_TGZ_B64 is configured in the QA environment. That viewer profile is only for visual capture; the pass/fail decision still comes from the Discord REST oracle.

CI uses the same command surface in .github/workflows/qa-live-transports-convex.yml. Scheduled and default manual runs execute the fast Matrix profile with live frontier credentials, --fast, and OPENCLAW_QA_MATRIX_NO_REPLY_WINDOW_MS=3000. Manual matrix_profile=all fans out into the five profile shards so the exhaustive catalog can run in parallel while keeping one artifact directory per shard.

For transport-real Telegram, Discord, and Slack smoke lanes:

pnpm openclaw qa telegram
pnpm openclaw qa discord
pnpm openclaw qa slack

They target a pre-existing real channel with two bots (driver + SUT). Required env vars, scenario lists, output artifacts, and the Convex credential pool are documented in Telegram, Discord, and Slack QA reference below.

For a full Slack desktop VM run with VNC rescue, run:

pnpm openclaw qa mantis slack-desktop-smoke \
  --gateway-setup \
  --scenario slack-canary \
  --keep-lease

That command leases a Crabbox desktop/browser machine, runs the Slack live lane inside the VM, opens Slack Web in the VNC browser, captures the desktop, and copies slack-qa/, slack-desktop-smoke.png, and slack-desktop-smoke.mp4 when video capture is available back to the Mantis artifact directory. Crabbox desktop/browser leases provide the capture tools and browser/native-build helper packages up front, so the scenario should only install fallbacks on older leases. Mantis reports total and per-phase timings in mantis-slack-desktop-smoke-report.md so slow runs show whether time went into lease warmup, credential acquisition, remote setup, or artifact copy. Reuse --lease-id <cbx_...> after logging in to Slack Web manually through VNC; reused leases also keep Crabbox's pnpm store cache warm. The default --hydrate-mode source verifies from a source checkout and runs install/build inside the VM. Use --hydrate-mode prehydrated only when the reused remote workspace already has node_modules and a built dist/; that mode skips the expensive install/build step and fails closed when the workspace is not ready. With --gateway-setup, Mantis leaves a persistent OpenClaw Slack gateway running inside the VM on port 38973; without it, the command runs the normal bot-to-bot Slack QA lane and exits after artifact capture.

To prove native Slack approval UI with desktop evidence, run the Mantis approval checkpoint mode:

pnpm openclaw qa mantis slack-desktop-smoke \
  --approval-checkpoints \
  --credential-source convex \
  --credential-role maintainer

This mode is mutually exclusive with --gateway-setup. It runs the Slack approval scenarios, rejects non-approval scenario ids, waits at each pending and resolved approval state, renders the observed Slack API message into approval-checkpoints/<scenario>-pending.png and approval-checkpoints/<scenario>-resolved.png, then fails if any checkpoint, message evidence, acknowledgement, or rendered screenshot is missing or empty. Cold CI leases may still show Slack sign-in in slack-desktop-smoke.png; the approval checkpoint images are the visual proof for this lane.

The operator checklist, GitHub workflow dispatch command, evidence-comment contract, hydrate-mode decision table, timing interpretation, and failure handling steps live in Mantis Slack Desktop Runbook.

For an agent/CV style desktop task, run:

pnpm openclaw qa mantis visual-task \
  --browser-url https://example.net \
  --expect-text "Example Domain" \
  --vision-model openai/gpt-5.5

visual-task leases or reuses a Crabbox desktop/browser machine, starts crabbox record --while, drives the visible browser through a nested visual-driver, captures visual-task.png, runs openclaw infer image describe against the screenshot when --vision-mode image-describe is selected, and writes visual-task.mp4, mantis-visual-task-summary.json, mantis-visual-task-driver-result.json, and mantis-visual-task-report.md. When --expect-text is set, the vision prompt asks for a structured JSON verdict and only passes when the model reports positive visible evidence; a negative response that merely quotes the target text fails the assertion. Use --vision-mode metadata for a no-model smoke that proves the desktop, browser, screenshot, and video plumbing without calling an image-understanding provider. Recording is a required artifact for visual-task; if Crabbox records no non-empty visual-task.mp4, the task fails even when the visual driver passed. On failure, Mantis keeps the lease for VNC unless the task had already passed and --keep-lease was not set.

Before using pooled live credentials, run:

pnpm openclaw qa credentials doctor

The doctor checks Convex broker env, validates endpoint settings, and verifies admin/list reachability when the maintainer secret is present. It reports only set/missing status for secrets.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Live transport lanes share one contract instead of each inventing their own scenario list shape. qa-消息通道 is the broad s…。

Live transport lanes share one contract instead of each inventing their own scenario list shape. qa-channel is the broad synthetic product-behavior suite and is not part of the live transport coverage matrix.

This keeps qa-channel as the broad product-behavior suite while Matrix, Telegram, and future live transports share one explicit transport-contract checklist.

For a disposable Linux VM lane without bringing Docker into the QA path, run:

pnpm openclaw qa suite --runner multipass --scenario channel-chat-baseline

This boots a fresh Multipass guest, installs dependencies, builds OpenClaw inside the guest, runs qa suite, then copies the normal QA report and summary back into .artifacts/qa-e2e/... on the host. It reuses the same scenario-selection behavior as qa suite on the host. Host and Multipass suite runs execute multiple selected scenarios in parallel with isolated gateway workers by default. qa-channel defaults to concurrency 4, capped by the selected scenario count. Use --concurrency <count> to tune the worker count, or --concurrency 1 for serial execution. Use --pack personal-agent to run the personal assistant benchmark pack. The pack selector is additive with repeated --scenario flags: explicit scenarios run first, then pack scenarios run in pack order with duplicates removed. Use --pack observability when a custom QA runner already supplies the OpenTelemetry collector setup and wants the OpenTelemetry and Prometheus diagnostics smoke scenarios selected together. The command exits non-zero when any scenario fails. Use --allow-failures when you want artifacts without a failing exit code. Live runs forward the supported QA auth inputs that are practical for the guest: env-based provider keys, the QA live provider config path, and CODEX_HOME when present. Keep --output-dir under the repo root so the guest can write back through the mounted workspace.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Matrix has a dedicated page because of its scenario count and Docker-backed home大房子服务器 provisioning. Telegram, Discord,…。

Matrix has a dedicated page because of its scenario count and Docker-backed homeserver provisioning. Telegram, Discord, and Slack are smaller - a handful of scenarios each, no profile system, against pre-existing real channels - so their reference lives here.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：These lanes register through extensions/qa-lab/src/live-transports/shared/live-transport-cli.ts and accept the same fla…。

These lanes register through extensions/qa-lab/src/live-transports/shared/live-transport-cli.ts and accept the same flags:

Each lane exits non-zero on any failed scenario. --allow-failures writes artifacts without setting a failing exit code.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Targets one real private Telegram 大家一起的房间 with two distinct bots (driver + SUT). The SUT bot must have a Telegram usern…。

pnpm openclaw qa telegram

Targets one real private Telegram group with two distinct bots (driver + SUT). The SUT bot must have a Telegram username; bot-to-bot observation works best when both bots have **Bot-to-Bot Communication Mode** enabled in @BotFather.

Required env when --credential-source env:

• OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_GROUP_ID - numeric chat id (string).
• OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_DRIVER_BOT_TOKEN
• OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_SUT_BOT_TOKEN

Optional:

• OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_CAPTURE_CONTENT=1 keeps message bodies in observed-message artifacts (default redacts).

Scenarios (extensions/qa-lab/src/live-transports/telegram/telegram-live.runtime.ts):

• telegram-canary
• telegram-mention-gating
• telegram-mentioned-message-reply
• telegram-help-command
• telegram-commands-command
• telegram-tools-compact-command
• telegram-whoami-command
• telegram-status-command
• telegram-repeated-command-authorization
• telegram-other-bot-command-gating
• telegram-context-command
• telegram-current-session-status-tool
• telegram-reply-chain-exact-marker
• telegram-stream-final-single-message
• telegram-long-final-reuses-preview
• telegram-long-final-three-chunks

The implicit default set always covers canary, mention gating, native command replies, command addressing, and bot-to-bot group replies. mock-openai defaults also include deterministic reply-chain and final-message streaming checks. telegram-current-session-status-tool remains opt-in because it is only stable when threaded directly after canary, not after arbitrary native command replies. Use pnpm openclaw qa telegram --list-scenarios --provider-mode mock-openai to print the current default/optional split with regression refs.

Output artifacts:

• telegram-qa-report.md
• telegram-qa-summary.json - includes per-reply RTT (driver send → observed SUT reply) starting with the canary.
• telegram-qa-observed-messages.json - bodies redacted unless OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_CAPTURE_CONTENT=1.

Package RTT comparison uses the same Telegram credential contract while keeping its RTT sample controls on the RTT harness path:

pnpm rtt openclaw@beta \
  --credential-source convex \
  --credential-role maintainer \
  --samples 20 \
  --sample-timeout-ms 30000

When --credential-source convex is set, the RTT Docker wrapper leases a kind: "telegram" credential, exports the leased group/driver/SUT bot env into the installed-package run, heartbeats the lease, and releases it on shutdown. --samples and --sample-timeout-ms still feed OPENCLAW_NPM_TELEGRAM_WARM_SAMPLES and OPENCLAW_NPM_TELEGRAM_SAMPLE_TIMEOUT_MS, so result.json remains comparable across env-backed and Convex-backed RTT runs.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Targets one real private Discord guild 消息通道 with two bots: a driver bot controlled by the harness and a SUT bot started…。

pnpm openclaw qa discord

Targets one real private Discord guild channel with two bots: a driver bot controlled by the harness and a SUT bot started by the child OpenClaw gateway through the bundled Discord plugin. Verifies channel mention handling, that the SUT bot has registered the native /help command with Discord, and opt-in Mantis evidence scenarios.

Required env when --credential-source env:

• OPENCLAW_QA_DISCORD_GUILD_ID
• OPENCLAW_QA_DISCORD_CHANNEL_ID
• OPENCLAW_QA_DISCORD_DRIVER_BOT_TOKEN
• OPENCLAW_QA_DISCORD_SUT_BOT_TOKEN
• OPENCLAW_QA_DISCORD_SUT_APPLICATION_ID - must match the SUT bot user id returned by Discord (the lane fails fast otherwise).

Optional:

• OPENCLAW_QA_DISCORD_CAPTURE_CONTENT=1 keeps message bodies in observed-message artifacts.
• OPENCLAW_QA_DISCORD_VOICE_CHANNEL_ID selects the voice/stage channel for discord-voice-autojoin; without it, the scenario picks the first visible voice/stage channel for the SUT bot.

Scenarios (extensions/qa-lab/src/live-transports/discord/discord-live.runtime.ts:36):

• discord-canary
• discord-mention-gating
• discord-native-help-command-registration
• discord-voice-autojoin - opt-in voice scenario. Runs by itself, enables channels.discord.voice.autoJoin, and verifies the SUT bot's current Discord voice state is the target voice/stage channel. Convex Discord credentials may include optional voiceChannelId; otherwise the runner discovers the first visible voice/stage channel in the guild.
• discord-status-reactions-tool-only - opt-in Mantis scenario. Runs by itself because it switches the SUT to always-on, tool-only guild replies with messages.statusReactions.enabled=true, then captures a REST reaction timeline plus HTML/PNG visual artifacts. Mantis before/after reports also preserve scenario-provided MP4 artifacts as baseline.mp4 and candidate.mp4.

Run the Discord voice auto-join scenario explicitly:

pnpm openclaw qa discord \
  --scenario discord-voice-autojoin \
  --provider-mode mock-openai

Run the Mantis status-reaction scenario explicitly:

pnpm openclaw qa discord \
  --scenario discord-status-reactions-tool-only \
  --provider-mode live-frontier \
  --model openai/gpt-5.5 \
  --alt-model openai/gpt-5.5 \
  --fast

Output artifacts:

• discord-qa-report.md
• discord-qa-summary.json
• discord-qa-observed-messages.json - bodies redacted unless OPENCLAW_QA_DISCORD_CAPTURE_CONTENT=1.
• discord-qa-reaction-timelines.json and discord-status-reactions-tool-only-timeline.png when the status-reaction scenario runs.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Targets one real private Slack 消息通道 with two distinct bots: a driver bot controlled by the harness and a SUT bot starte…。

pnpm openclaw qa slack

Targets one real private Slack channel with two distinct bots: a driver bot controlled by the harness and a SUT bot started by the child OpenClaw gateway through the bundled Slack plugin.

Required env when --credential-source env:

• OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_CHANNEL_ID
• OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_DRIVER_BOT_TOKEN
• OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_SUT_BOT_TOKEN
• OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_SUT_APP_TOKEN

Optional:

checkpoints for Mantis. The runner writes <scenario>.pending.json and <scenario>.resolved.json, then waits for matching .ack.json files.

acknowledgement timeout. The default is 120000.

• OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_CAPTURE_CONTENT=1 keeps message bodies in observed-message artifacts.
• OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_APPROVAL_CHECKPOINT_DIR enables visual approval
• OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_APPROVAL_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT_MS overrides the checkpoint

Scenarios (extensions/qa-lab/src/live-transports/slack/slack-live.runtime.ts):

Requests an exec approval through the gateway, verifies the Slack message has native approval buttons, resolves it, and verifies the resolved Slack update.

Enables exec and plugin approval forwarding together so plugin events are not suppressed by exec approval routing, then verifies the same pending/resolved native Slack UI path.

• slack-canary
• slack-mention-gating
• slack-allowlist-block
• slack-top-level-reply-shape
• slack-restart-resume
• slack-thread-follow-up
• slack-thread-isolation
• slack-approval-exec-native - opt-in native Slack exec approval scenario.
• slack-approval-plugin-native - opt-in native Slack plugin approval scenario.

Output artifacts:

OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_APPROVAL_CHECKPOINT_DIR; contains checkpoint JSON, acknowledgement JSON, and pending/resolved screenshots.

• slack-qa-report.md
• slack-qa-summary.json
• slack-qa-observed-messages.json - bodies redacted unless OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_CAPTURE_CONTENT=1.
• approval-checkpoints/ - only when Mantis sets

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：The lane needs two distinct Slack apps in one workspace, plus a 消息通道 both bots are members of: Prefer a Slack workspace…。

The lane needs two distinct Slack apps in one workspace, plus a channel both bots are members of:

• channelId - the Cxxxxxxxxxx id of a channel both bots have been invited to. Use a dedicated channel; the lane posts on every run.
• driverBotToken - bot token (xoxb-...) of the **Driver** app.
• sutBotToken - bot token (xoxb-...) of the **SUT** app, which must be a separate Slack app from the driver so its bot user id is distinct.
• sutAppToken - app-level token (xapp-...) of the SUT app with connections:write, used by Socket Mode so the SUT app can receive events.

Prefer a Slack workspace dedicated to QA over reusing a production workspace.

The SUT manifest below intentionally narrows the bundled Slack plugin's production install (extensions/slack/src/setup-shared.ts:10) to the permissions and events covered by the live Slack QA suite. For the production-channel setup as users see it, see Slack channel quick setup; the QA Driver/SUT pair is intentionally separate because the lane needs two distinct bot user ids in one workspace.

**1. Create the Driver app**

Go to api.slack.com/apps → _Create New App_ → _From a manifest_ → pick the QA workspace, paste the following manifest, then _Install to Workspace_:

{
  "display_information": {
    "name": "OpenClaw QA Driver",
    "description": "Test driver bot for OpenClaw QA Slack live lane"
  },
  "features": {
    "bot_user": {
      "display_name": "OpenClaw QA Driver",
      "always_online": true
    }
  },
  "oauth_config": {
    "scopes": {
      "bot": ["chat:write", "channels:history", "groups:history", "users:read"]
    }
  },
  "settings": {
    "socket_mode_enabled": false
  }
}

Copy the _Bot User OAuth Token_ (xoxb-...) - that becomes driverBotToken. The driver only needs to post messages and identify itself; no events, no Socket Mode.

**2. Create the SUT app**

Repeat _Create New App → From a manifest_ in the same workspace. This QA app intentionally uses a narrower version of the bundled Slack plugin's production manifest (extensions/slack/src/setup-shared.ts:10): reaction scopes and events are omitted because the live Slack QA suite does not cover reaction handling yet.

{
  "display_information": {
    "name": "OpenClaw QA SUT",
    "description": "OpenClaw QA SUT connector for OpenClaw"
  },
  "features": {
    "bot_user": {
      "display_name": "OpenClaw QA SUT",
      "always_online": true
    },
    "app_home": {
      "home_tab_enabled": true,
      "messages_tab_enabled": true,
      "messages_tab_read_only_enabled": false
    }
  },
  "oauth_config": {
    "scopes": {
      "bot": [
        "app_mentions:read",
        "assistant:write",
        "channels:history",
        "channels:read",
        "chat:write",
        "commands",
        "emoji:read",
        "files:read",
        "files:write",
        "groups:history",
        "groups:read",
        "im:history",
        "im:read",
        "im:write",
        "mpim:history",
        "mpim:read",
        "mpim:write",
        "pins:read",
        "pins:write",
        "usergroups:read",
        "users:read"
      ]
    }
  },
  "settings": {
    "socket_mode_enabled": true,
    "event_subscriptions": {
      "bot_events": [
        "app_home_opened",
        "app_mention",
        "channel_rename",
        "member_joined_channel",
        "member_left_channel",
        "message.channels",
        "message.groups",
        "message.im",
        "message.mpim",
        "pin_added",
        "pin_removed"
      ]
    }
  }
}

After Slack creates the app, do two things on its settings page:

• _Install to Workspace_ → copy the _Bot User OAuth Token_ → that becomes sutBotToken.
• _Basic Information → App-Level Tokens → Generate Token and Scopes_ → add scope connections:write → save → copy the xapp-... value → that becomes sutAppToken.

Verify the two bots have distinct user ids by calling auth.test on each token. The runtime distinguishes driver and SUT by user id; reusing one app for both will fail mention-gating immediately.

**3. Create the channel**

In the QA workspace, create a channel (e.g. #openclaw-qa) and invite both bots from inside the channel:

/invite @OpenClaw QA Driver
/invite @OpenClaw QA SUT

Copy the Cxxxxxxxxxx id from _channel info → About → Channel ID_ - that becomes channelId. A public channel works; if you use a private channel both apps already have groups:history so the harness's history reads will still succeed.

**4. Register the credentials**

Two options. Use env vars for single-machine debugging (set the four OPENCLAW_QA_SLACK_* variables and pass --credential-source env), or seed the shared Convex pool so CI and other maintainers can lease them.

For the Convex pool, write the four fields to a JSON file:

{
  "channelId": "Cxxxxxxxxxx",
  "driverBotToken": "xoxb-...",
  "sutBotToken": "xoxb-...",
  "sutAppToken": "xapp-..."
}

With OPENCLAW_QA_CONVEX_SITE_URL and OPENCLAW_QA_CONVEX_SECRET_MAINTAINER exported in your shell, register and verify:

pnpm openclaw qa credentials add \
  --kind slack \
  --payload-file slack-creds.json \
  --note "QA Slack pool seed"

pnpm openclaw qa credentials list --kind slack --status all --json

Expect count: 1, status: "active", no lease field.

**5. Verify end to end**

Run the lane locally to confirm both bots can talk to each other through the broker:

pnpm openclaw qa slack \
  --credential-source convex \
  --credential-role maintainer \
  --output-dir .artifacts/qa-e2e/slack-local

A green run completes in well under 30 seconds and slack-qa-report.md shows both slack-canary and slack-mention-gating at status pass. If the lane hangs for ~90 seconds and exits with Convex credential pool exhausted for kind "slack", either the pool is empty or every row is leased - qa credentials list --kind slack --status all --json will tell you which.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Telegram, Discord, Slack, and WhatsApp lanes can lease credentials from a shared Convex pool instead of reading the env…。

Telegram, Discord, Slack, and WhatsApp lanes can lease credentials from a shared Convex pool instead of reading the env vars above. Pass --credential-source convex (or set OPENCLAW_QA_CREDENTIAL_SOURCE=convex); QA Lab acquires an exclusive lease, heartbeats it for the duration of the run, and releases it on shutdown. Pool kinds are "telegram", "discord", "slack", and "whatsapp".

Payload shapes the broker validates on admin/add:

• Telegram (kind: "telegram"): { groupId: string, driverToken: string, sutToken: string } - groupId must be a numeric chat-id string.
• Telegram real user (kind: "telegram-user"): { groupId: string, sutToken: string, testerUserId: string, testerUsername: string, telegramApiId: string, telegramApiHash: string, tdlibDatabaseEncryptionKey: string, tdlibArchiveBase64: string, tdlibArchiveSha256: string, desktopTdataArchiveBase64: string, desktopTdataArchiveSha256: string } - Mantis Telegram Desktop proof only. Generic QA Lab lanes must not acquire this kind.
• Discord (kind: "discord"): { guildId: string, channelId: string, driverBotToken: string, sutBotToken: string, sutApplicationId: string }.
• WhatsApp (kind: "whatsapp"): { driverPhoneE164: string, sutPhoneE164: string, driverAuthArchiveBase64: string, sutAuthArchiveBase64: string, groupJid?: string } - phone numbers must be distinct E.164 strings.

The Mantis Telegram Desktop proof workflow holds one exclusive Convex telegram-user lease for both the TDLib CLI driver and Telegram Desktop witness, then releases it after publishing proof.

When a PR needs a deterministic visual diff, Mantis can use the same mock model reply on main and on the PR head while the Telegram formatter or delivery layer changes. Capture defaults are tuned for PR comments: standard Crabbox class, 24fps desktop recording, 24fps motion GIF, and 1920px preview width. Before/after comments should publish a clean bundle that contains only the intended GIFs.

Slack lanes can also use the pool. Slack payload shape checks currently live in the Slack QA runner rather than the broker; use { channelId: string, driverBotToken: string, sutBotToken: string, sutAppToken: string }, with a Slack channel id like Cxxxxxxxxxx. See Setting up the Slack workspace for app and scope provisioning.

Operational env vars and the Convex broker endpoint contract live in Testing → Shared Telegram credentials via Convex (the section name predates the multi-channel pool; the lease semantics are shared across kinds).

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Seed assets live in qa/: These are intentionally in git so the QA plan is visible to both humans and the 机器人朋友. qa-lab…。

Seed assets live in qa/:

• qa/scenarios/index.md
• qa/scenarios/<theme>/*.md

These are intentionally in git so the QA plan is visible to both humans and the agent.

qa-lab should stay a generic markdown runner. Each scenario markdown file is the source of truth for one test run and should define:

• scenario metadata
• optional category, capability, lane, and risk metadata
• docs and code refs
• optional plugin requirements
• optional gateway config patch
• the executable qa-flow

The reusable runtime surface that backs qa-flow is allowed to stay generic and cross-cutting. For example, markdown scenarios can combine transport-side helpers with browser-side helpers that drive the embedded Control UI through the Gateway browser.request seam without adding a special-case runner.

Scenario files should be grouped by product capability rather than source tree folder. Keep scenario IDs stable when files move; use docsRefs and codeRefs for implementation traceability.

The baseline list should stay broad enough to cover:

• DM and channel chat
• thread behavior
• message action lifecycle
• cron callbacks
• memory recall
• model switching
• subagent handoff
• repo-reading and docs-reading
• one small build task such as Lobster Invaders

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：qa suite has two local provider mock lanes: deterministic mock lane for repo-backed QA and parity gates. fixture, recor…。

qa suite has two local provider mock lanes:

deterministic mock lane for repo-backed QA and parity gates.

fixture, record/replay, and chaos coverage. It is additive and does not replace the mock-openai scenario dispatcher.

• mock-openai is the scenario-aware OpenClaw mock. It remains the default
• aimock starts an AIMock-backed provider server for experimental protocol,

Provider-lane implementation lives under extensions/qa-lab/src/providers/. Each provider owns its defaults, local server startup, gateway model config, auth-profile staging needs, and live/mock capability flags. Shared suite and gateway code should route through the provider registry instead of branching on provider names.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：qa-lab owns a generic transport seam for markdown QA scenarios. qa-消息通道 is the first adapter on that seam, but the desi…。

qa-lab owns a generic transport seam for markdown QA scenarios. qa-channel is the first adapter on that seam, but the design target is wider: future real or synthetic channels should plug into the same suite runner instead of adding a transport-specific QA runner.

At the architecture level, the split is:

• qa-lab owns generic scenario execution, worker concurrency, artifact writing, and reporting.
• The transport adapter owns gateway config, readiness, inbound and outbound observation, transport actions, and normalized transport state.
• Markdown scenario files under qa/scenarios/ define the test run; qa-lab provides the reusable runtime surface that executes them.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Adding a 消息通道 to the markdown QA system requires exactly two things: 1. A transport adapter for the 消息通道. 2. A scenario…。

Adding a channel to the markdown QA system requires exactly two things:

1. A transport adapter for the channel. 2. A scenario pack that exercises the channel contract.

Do not add a new top-level QA command root when the shared qa-lab host can own the flow.

qa-lab owns the shared host mechanics:

• the openclaw qa command root
• suite startup and teardown
• worker concurrency
• artifact writing
• report generation
• scenario execution
• compatibility aliases for older qa-channel scenarios

Runner plugins own the transport contract:

• how openclaw qa <runner> is mounted beneath the shared qa root
• how the gateway is configured for that transport
• how readiness is checked
• how inbound events are injected
• how outbound messages are observed
• how transcripts and normalized transport state are exposed
• how transport-backed actions are executed
• how transport-specific reset or cleanup is handled

The minimum adoption bar for a new channel:

1. Keep qa-lab as the owner of the shared qa root. 2. Implement the transport runner on the shared qa-lab host seam. 3. Keep transport-specific mechanics inside the runner plugin or channel harness. 4. Mount the runner as openclaw qa <runner> instead of registering a competing root command. Runner plugins should declare qaRunners in openclaw.plugin.json and export a matching qaRunnerCliRegistrations array from runtime-api.ts. Keep runtime-api.ts light; lazy CLI and runner execution should stay behind separate entrypoints. 5. Author or adapt markdown scenarios under the themed qa/scenarios/ directories. 6. Use the generic scenario helpers for new scenarios. 7. Keep existing compatibility aliases working unless the repo is doing an intentional migration.

The decision rule is strict:

• If behavior can be expressed once in qa-lab, put it in qa-lab.
• If behavior depends on one channel transport, keep it in that runner plugin or plugin harness.
• If a scenario needs a new capability that more than one channel can use, add a generic helper instead of a channel-specific branch in suite.ts.
• If a behavior is only meaningful for one transport, keep the scenario transport-specific and make that explicit in the scenario contract.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：Preferred generic helpers for new scenarios: Compatibility aliases remain available for existing scenarios - waitForQa消…。

Preferred generic helpers for new scenarios:

• waitForTransportReady
• waitForChannelReady
• injectInboundMessage
• injectOutboundMessage
• waitForTransportOutboundMessage
• waitForChannelOutboundMessage
• waitForNoTransportOutbound
• getTransportSnapshot
• readTransportMessage
• readTransportTranscript
• formatTransportTranscript
• resetTransport

Compatibility aliases remain available for existing scenarios - waitForQaChannelReady, waitForOutboundMessage, waitForNoOutbound, formatConversationTranscript, resetBus - but new scenario authoring should use the generic names. The aliases exist to avoid a flag-day migration, not as the model going forward.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：qa-lab exports a Markdown protocol report from the observed bus timeline. The report should answer: For the inventory o…。

qa-lab exports a Markdown protocol report from the observed bus timeline. The report should answer:

• What worked
• What failed
• What stayed blocked
• What follow-up scenarios are worth adding

For the inventory of available scenarios - useful when sizing follow-up work or wiring a new transport - run pnpm openclaw qa coverage (add --json for machine-readable output). When choosing focused proof for a touched behavior or file path, run pnpm openclaw qa coverage --match <query>. The match report searches scenario metadata, docs refs, code refs, coverage IDs, plugins, and provider requirements, then prints matching qa suite --scenario ... targets. Treat it as a discovery aid, not a gate replacement; the selected scenario still needs the right provider mode, live transport, Multipass, Testbox, or release lane for the behavior under test.

For character and style checks, run the same scenario across multiple live model refs and write a judged Markdown report:

pnpm openclaw qa character-eval \
  --model openai/gpt-5.5,thinking=medium,fast \
  --model openai/gpt-5.2,thinking=xhigh \
  --model openai/gpt-5,thinking=xhigh \
  --model anthropic/claude-opus-4-7,thinking=high \
  --model anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6,thinking=high \
  --model zai/glm-5.1,thinking=high \
  --model moonshot/kimi-k2.5,thinking=high \
  --model google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview,thinking=high \
  --judge-model openai/gpt-5.5,thinking=xhigh,fast \
  --judge-model anthropic/claude-opus-4-7,thinking=high \
  --blind-judge-models \
  --concurrency 16 \
  --judge-concurrency 16

The command runs local QA gateway child processes, not Docker. Character eval scenarios should set the persona through SOUL.md, then run ordinary user turns such as chat, workspace help, and small file tasks. The candidate model should not be told that it is being evaluated. The command preserves each full transcript, records basic run stats, then asks the judge models in fast mode with xhigh reasoning where supported to rank the runs by naturalness, vibe, and humor. Use --blind-judge-models when comparing providers: the judge prompt still gets every transcript and run status, but candidate refs are replaced with neutral labels such as candidate-01; the report maps rankings back to real refs after parsing. Candidate runs default to high thinking, with medium for GPT-5.5 and xhigh for older OpenAI eval refs that support it. Override a specific candidate inline with --model provider/model,thinking=<level>. --thinking <level> still sets a global fallback, and the older --model-thinking <provider/model=level> form is kept for compatibility. OpenAI candidate refs default to fast mode so priority processing is used where the provider supports it. Add ,fast, ,no-fast, or ,fast=false inline when a single candidate or judge needs an override. Pass --fast only when you want to force fast mode on for every candidate model. Candidate and judge durations are recorded in the report for benchmark analysis, but judge prompts explicitly say not to rank by speed. Candidate and judge model runs both default to concurrency 16. Lower --concurrency or --judge-concurrency when provider limits or local gateway pressure make a run too noisy. When no candidate --model is passed, the character eval defaults to openai/gpt-5.5, openai/gpt-5.2, openai/gpt-5, anthropic/claude-opus-4-7, anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6, zai/glm-5.1, moonshot/kimi-k2.5, and google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview when no --model is passed. When no --judge-model is passed, the judges default to openai/gpt-5.5,thinking=xhigh,fast and anthropic/claude-opus-4-7,thinking=high.

如果把这一段摆成一个小场景，你会看到几样东西正在互相打招呼、拦路或者传东西。别急着记名词，先抓住它此刻到底在发生什么：---。

• Matrix QA
• Personal agent benchmark pack
• QA Channel
• Testing
• Dashboard

---